Skip to main content

In downtrend markets as we’ve seen through much of 2022, it’s important to distinguish between price declines that can present themselves in a similar fashion. Active index and fundamental portfolios have evolved, but not all securities evolve for the same reasons. Some investments move because the fair value has gone down; others move because they become “cheaper”. Since indices are designed to be measures of the current market, any market decline experienced in index portfolios is inherently a decline in fair value. However, it is the responsibility of the fundamental investor to isolate securities whose underlying value is less volatile than the prices of the securities, to buy as the instruments become cheaper and to sell when they reach or exceed the price. just value.

To that end, the value investor’s job is not just to find good companies, but to find misunderstood companies. It is a kind of analysis arbitration. The most attractive securities are those that are not only issued by strong companies, but are also cheap. In an undulating market, a value discount can sometimes offset market movements and dampen volatility. In a rising market, earnings can reveal the additional value that can be found in an undervalued security. And when the market or economy faces headwinds, it’s an opportunity to separate the fundamentally challenged from the fundamentally cheap – to avoid the issuer who has experienced a decline in fair value in favor of the issuer which only experienced a price drop.

When looking at the economic environment today, this distinction is particularly notable. The first half of 2022 was a headwind for all credit portfolios, fundamental or not. And there’s no way to sugarcoat why. The risk of a recession in the short or medium term is not low. Wage gains have yet to catch up with recent inflation, and the impact is being felt across the country. However, the fact that consumers are so unhappy with higher prices tells us less about the alleged opportunism of the small business owner than about the visceral impact of higher prices on people’s fiscal confidence. In fact, there are plenty of indicators to show this (see Figure 1).

However, as we move forward into the current earnings season, we are struck by two important observations. First, we have seen the same dynamic seen in mid-2020, where fundamentally attractive bonds that are not members of an index have seen declines in price commensurate with the indices but have not yet experienced the same level. recovery. After all, issuers whose strength is demonstrated by earnings and not by the supply and demand of market indices derive their momentum from quarterly earnings reports rather than real-time based on market correlations. Additionally, the types of value-oriented investors who buy such bonds between earnings tend to be more opportunistic, taking longer to accept that the fair price to pay is higher than the lowest price paid recently. . This means that the payback period for these bonds is not as immediate as for higher beta securities. As a result, returns on securities with a fundamental investment thesis are currently higher on average than the return on equity indices. This is not always the case and shows relative desirability through careful stock selection in the current environment.

However, this brings us to our second observation. Babies are thrown out with the bathwater, often because of the very misunderstandings that fundamental investors seek to exploit. For example, recently, the low revenues of the company Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY, Financial) pushed the market to sell bonds issued by Michaels as a sign of sympathy. At first glance, the reasons were logical. Costs were higher and supply chain issues were at the forefront. However, a failure to appreciate the difference between the underlying customers of the two issuers or the dynamics driving those customers to shop is also evident in the resulting analyst reports. The comparison stopped at the platitudes: they are both brick-and-mortar retail businesses with potential cost and supply issues due to inflation.

However, what Michaels has demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantine(s) is that it is a company that is doing well in these difficult economic times. Despite the impact of recession fears and uncertainty on retail as a whole, artisans and other artists are leaning on their hobbies in such environments. Even more so for shoppers looking for the basic types of supplies found at Bed Bath & Beyond, which can also be easily found on Amazon (AMZN, financial) or at Target, (TGT, Financial), Michaels’ main client has few alternatives. Meanwhile, where the Bed Bath & Beyond guest’s discretionary spending can be reduced, the equivalent at Michaels tends to be seasonal or during holidays. That doesn’t mean consumers won’t cut back on spending, but as we’ve seen over the past two years, celebrating occasions when possible can be a relief valve from the overall feeling of pressure on the wallet.

Often, when we think of opportunistic investors, we imagine hedge funds taking outsized risks and profiting if they are right. However, there is another form of opportunistic portfolio management that is more about exploiting misunderstandings in the fundamental nature of a business. In this example, the underlying dynamics of these two companies are different, but the current market has treated them the same. It seems that most analysts’ conclusions stop at a superficial view of a company and credit metrics. But therein lies the opportunity.

*****

Venk Reddy is the Chief Investment Officer of Sustainable Credit Strategies at Osterweis Capital Management. Founded in 1983, Osterweis Capital Management is an independent asset manager with over $7 billion under management as of March 31, 2022. The firm provides investment management services to institutions and individuals through mutual funds and segregated accounts, offering both equity and fixed income investment strategies. . Learn more about www.osterweis.com.

Important Disclosure Information

Past performance does not represent future results. Different types of investments involve different degrees of risk. Accordingly, it should not be assumed that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by Osterweis Capital Management, LLC ( “OCM”) or any non-investment related service, will be profitable, will match any historical level of performance, will be suitable for a specific portfolio or situation, or will prove to be successful. Historical performance results for indices of investment, benchmarks and/or categories have been provided for general information/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custody fees, the deduction of any commission investment management nor the impact of taxes, the occurrence of which would diminish historical performance results. comparatives. Please also note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) benchmarks/comparative indices may be more or less volatile than your accounts; and (3) a description of each benchmark/benchmark is available upon request. OCM is neither a law firm nor an accounting firm, and no part of its services should be construed as legal, tax or accounting advice. Further, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as receipt or substitute for personalized investment advice from OCM. Existing clients should remember that it is your responsibility to notify OCM, in writing, of any change in your personal/financial circumstances or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing, evaluating or revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you wish to impose, add or modify reasonable restrictions on our investment advice services. A copy of our current written information brochure dealing with our advisory services and fees is available on request or at www.osterweis.com. The scope of services to be provided depends on the client’s needs and the terms of the assignment.

Neither acknowledgments by publications, media, or other organizations, nor the attainment of a professional designation, certification, degree or license, membership in a professional organization, or any experience or past success should not be construed by a customer or potential customer. as a guarantee that it will obtain a certain level of results if OCM is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services.